tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post112627313366639479..comments2023-10-10T08:02:18.073-04:00Comments on Rationally Speaking: So, nobody could have predicted the New Orleans disaster, eh?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post-1128349405904418642005-10-03T10:23:00.000-04:002005-10-03T10:23:00.000-04:00I find it ironic that the president who started a ...I find it ironic that the president who started a war based on weapons that weren’t there screwed up a natural disaster relief effort because he ignored information that was there.<BR/><BR/>RickAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post-1126358658985226752005-09-10T09:24:00.000-04:002005-09-10T09:24:00.000-04:00My mistake, the title link usually goes to the per...My mistake, the title link usually goes to the permalink version of the story.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post-1126341362059655022005-09-10T04:36:00.000-04:002005-09-10T04:36:00.000-04:00Wow, I'd read that article and yet I hadn't though...Wow, I'd read that article and yet I hadn't thought of it this entire time. I must be getting old.<BR/><BR/>Good find.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post-1126278622468375502005-09-09T11:10:00.000-04:002005-09-09T11:10:00.000-04:00Eric, the link is embedded in the title of the pos...Eric, the link is embedded in the title of the post.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09099460671669064269noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post-1126277353224360352005-09-09T10:49:00.000-04:002005-09-09T10:49:00.000-04:00Could you actually post the link?The better eviden...Could you actually post the link?<BR/><BR/>The better evidence is Pam, the theoretical cat 5 hurrican senario that FEMA played out laster year in NO.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post-1126276636114325692005-09-09T10:37:00.000-04:002005-09-09T10:37:00.000-04:00Eric, that wasn't my main point. The eerie thing i...Eric, that wasn't my main point. The eerie thing is how accurately the article describes the devastation, almost a year before it happened.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09099460671669064269noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15005476.post-1126276485849826572005-09-09T10:34:00.000-04:002005-09-09T10:34:00.000-04:00I think this post falls under the "DUH" heading. ...I think this post falls under the "DUH" heading. I don't think ANYONE* would argue with the fact that Bush was an idiot for saying that it could not have been predicted.<BR/><BR/>* Any rational person at least.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com